Evaluating Nippon Yusen Kaisha’s Remote Diagnostic Center: An Analysis of End-User Perspectives Among Engine Management-Level Officers

Authors

  • Aloysius Gio P. Arranz Graduate School, Philippine Merchant Marine Academy, San Narciso, Zambales 2205, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.09.39

Keywords:

Remote Diagnostic Center (RDC), Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK), Engine Management-Level Officers, Maritime Digitalization, Predictive Maintenance, Ship Operations Efficiency, End-User Perspectives

Abstract

The integration of shore-based diagnostics in maritime operations is reshaping shipboard maintenance and decision-making practices. This study evaluated Nippon Yusen Kaisha’s Remote Diagnostic Center (RDC) from the perspectives of engine management-level officers onboard its vessels. Specifically, it assessed the RDC’s usefulness, clarity, reliability, ease of use, influence on decision-making, and challenges in shipboard integration.

A total of 214 respondents, equally divided between Chief Engineers and Second Engineers, participated through a structured survey analysed using descriptive statistics. Findings revealed that the RDC is moderately useful in enhancing data-driven decisions and supporting the Planned Maintenance System (PMS). It assists in detecting abnormalities and promoting condition-based maintenance, though its reports remain supplementary to firsthand inspections. Reports were generally viewed as clear and accessible, but their influence on major decisions was moderate.

The study concludes that NYK’s RDC is a reliable support tool with room for improvement. Enhancements in scope, usability, and real-time responsiveness are recommended to maximize operational value in maritime practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABS (2021) Advisory on remote survey and digital technologies. American Bureau of Shipping. [https://ww2.eagle.org], ac-cessed August 30, 2025.

ABB Marine & Ports (2023) Digitalization and predictive maintenance in marine pro-pulsion. [https://new.abb.com/marine], accessed August 30, 2025.

Ahola J, Salmela H, Mäkinen S (2021) Tech-nostress in maritime operations: A study of digital platform overload. J Occup Saf Sea. 27(1):33-48.

Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) (2022) Digital transformation in shipping: Barriers and opportunities. [https://www.bimco.org], accessed Au-gust 30, 2025.

Berg J, Albrecht M, Larsen T (2024) Predictive diagnostics in naval engineering: Lessons from naval vessel maintenance. J Mar Technol. 59(1):45-61.

ClassNK (2024) UMS-certified bulk carriers and digital innovations. [https://www.classnk.or.jp], accessed August 30, 2025.

Chin C, Lee H, Ramos S (2023) Integrating AI and IoT in maritime infrastructure: Chal-lenges and strategies. J Marit Digital. 11(3):150-172.

Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, per-ceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3):319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DNV (2022) Remote monitoring services. Det Norske Veritas. [https://www.dnv.com], accessed August 30, 2025.

DNV (2023) Maritime forecast to 2050. Det Norske Veritas. [https://www.dnv.com/publications/maritime-forecast-to-2050-2023-248619], accessed August 30, 2025.

Fischer S, Yamamoto T, Liang Y (2020) En-hancing shipboard safety through predic-tive maintenance systems. Mar Syst Eng Rev. 18(2):89-102.

Frontiers in Marine Science (2022) Condition-based maintenance in maritime vessels. Front Mar Sci. 9:1203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.01203

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. (2023) IoS-OP and the future of smart shipping. [https://www.furuno.com], accessed Au-gust 30, 2025.

Gomez E, Ryu H (2023) Barriers to remote di-agnostics in multinational maritime crews. Int J Marit Stud. 29(1):77-94.

International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) (2023) Digital transformation and hu-man-centred design in maritime safety. [https://www.ics-shipping.org], accessed August 30, 2025.

International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2021) IMO GHG strategy: Decarbonizing shipping. [https://www.imo.org], ac-cessed August 30, 2025.

International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) (2023) Human-centered digitaliza-tion in seafaring. [https://www.itfglobal.org], accessed August 30, 2025.

Kristiansen T (2022) The role of diagnostic centers in improving fleet management. Marit Technol Today. 36(4):210-228.

Mallam SC, Nazir S, Renganayagalu SK (2020) Human factors in maritime safety: Bridg-ing the gap between technology and sea-farers. WMU J Marit Affairs. 19:129-149.

MSC 104/WP.7 (2021) Report on autonomous ship technologies. International Maritime Organization

NYK ESG Report (2021) NYK Line environ-mental, social and governance initiatives. [https://www.nyk.com], accessed August 30, 2025.

NYK Line (2022) Remote Diagnostic Center: Smart shipping initiative. [https://www.nyk.com/english/], ac-cessed August 30, 2025.

NYK News (2022) NYK and IoS-OP develop-ments. [https://www.nyk.com/english/news/2022/], accessed August 30, 2025.

Rolls Royce (2021) Intelligent asset manage-ment for maritime applications. [https://www.rolls-royce.com], accessed August 30, 2025.

Wärtsilä (2023) Remote diagnostics and hy-brid propulsion integration. [https://www.wartsila.com], accessed August 30, 2025.

Perera L, Mo B, Sørensen A (2019) Decision-support systems in ship machinery opera-tions: A human factors perspective. Ocean Eng. 183:234-246.

Sundar V, Papadopoulos A (2024) Human–machine interaction in smart ships: De-sign and usability challenges. Hum Fac-tors Marit Syst. 17(1):66-82.

Theotokatos G, Boulougouris E, Yoon S (2022) Standardization in shipboard diagnostics: Addressing multicultural integration. Mar Eng J. 42(3):199-215.

Zhang K, Li Q, Singh M (2024) Data overload in maritime diagnostics: The need for smart filtering. Int J Marit Syst. 19(2):99-116.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Due to confidentiality agreements with Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK), some data are not publicly available. Aggregated survey results have been anonymized to protect the identity of respondents and may be shared upon request for academic and research purposes.

How to Cite

Arranz, A. G. P. (2025). Evaluating Nippon Yusen Kaisha’s Remote Diagnostic Center: An Analysis of End-User Perspectives Among Engine Management-Level Officers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(9), 4778-4794. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.09.39