Problems and Concerns at the Sheriff’s Office of the National Labor Rela-tions Commission – National Capital Region Arbitration Branch (Nlrc-Ncrab) with the Writ of Execution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.11.13Keywords:
Concerns, National Labor Relations Commission, Problems, Sheriff, Writ of ExecutionAbstract
This study aims to address the encountered problems and concerns of the National Labor Relations Commission – National Capital Region Arbitration Branch (NLRC-NCRAB) Sheriffs in implementing the writ of execution. A quantitative and descriptive research approach was used, with a survey questionnaire as the research instrument tool. 29 active sheriffs in the NLRC-NCRAB were the respondents of this study. Findings show that most of the incumbent sheriffs at the NLRC- NCRAB are 51-65 years old, have been in the service for at least 6-10 years, and are college graduates. A substantial number received more or less 11-20 writs of execution in a month; a more significant number satisfied an average of 1-10 writs. It was concluded that among the problems and concerns at the Sheriff’s Office regarding the issuance of the writ is the “non-issuance of the break-open, contempt order, and show-cause order” being the top compared to other raised issues encountered by them (M=3.93). It also reveals that parties' compliance relative to the writ, a predominant calculated mean of 3.86, points to the “no coordination by the prevailing parties with the sheriff assigned to the case” and is considered similarly “serious.” Correlatively, the results reveal that in terms of writ implementation, the “non-provision of bonded warehouse and towing vehicles” exhibited the most rated among the enumerated issues and was interpreted “very serious” problem being encountered by the NLRC-NCRAB Sheriffs with a determined mean average of 4.28.
Downloads
References
Marufjon, Tazhiboev. “Legal, Reasonable and Fair Court Decision: Requirements, Analysis and Pro-posals.” The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, vol. 02, no. 06, 29 June 2020, pp. 44–50, google-scholar.com/index.php/tajssei/article/view/4, 10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue06-12. Accessed 15 Oct. 2022. https://google-scholar.com/index.php/tajssei/article/view/4
Goldberg, Stephen B., et al. Dispute Resolution: Negotia-tion, Mediation, Arbitration, and Other Processes. Google Books, Aspen Publishing, 2 Feb. 2020, books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tAGBEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=sb+goldberg+2020&ots=7SGmdFVi80&sig=91G0fpFXedYY1g-Uj7vZold9HX0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=sb%20goldberg%202020&f=false. Accessed 15 Oct. 2022. https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tAGBEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=sb+goldberg+2020&ots=7SGmdFVi80&sig=91G0fpFXedYY1g-Uj7vZold9HX0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=sb%20goldberg%202020&f=false
“Sheriff Education Requirements: Degrees, Majors, Col-leges - Zippia.” Zippia.com, 2 Oct. 2020, www.zippia.com/sheriff-jobs/education/. Ac-cessed 14 Oct. 2022. https://www.zippia.com/sheriff-jobs/education/
Watson, Roger. “Quantitative Research - ProQuest.” Www.proquest.com, 1 Apr. 2015, www.proquest.com/openview/058c84ecfd436cf965eacb1556000ab0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2042228. https://www.proquest.com/openview/058c84ecfd436cf965eacb1556000ab0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2042228
McCombes, Shona. “Descriptive Research Design | Defi-nition, Methods and Examples.” Scribbr, 15 May 2019, www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
“Writ of Execution Definition.” Investopedia, 2022, www.investopedia.com/terms/w/writ-of-execution.asp. Accessed 14 Oct. 2022. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/writ-of-execution.asp
Desierto, Diane. SHIFTING SANDS in the INTERNATION-AL ECONOMIC SYSTEM: “ARBITRAGE” in INTER-NATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW and INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS.
Eze, Sylvester N. S. “ENFORCEMENT and EXECUTION of JUDGMENT and ORERS of COURT in NIGERIA.” Idemili Bar Journal, vol. 1, no. 0, 3 Mar. 2021, www.journals.ezenwaohaetorc.org/index.php/IBJ/article/view/1514. Accessed 15 Oct. 2022. https://www.journals.ezenwaohaetorc.org/index.php/IBJ/article/view/1514
“ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 12.” Lawphil.net, 2022, lawphil.net/courts/supreme/ac/ac_12_noyear.html. Accessed 15 Oct. 2022. https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/ac/ac_12_noyear.html
“Enforcement Actions. Are They Measures of Responsi-bility?” LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН), 2018, lexrussi-ca.msal.ru/jour/article/view/516?locale=en_US, 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.136.3.009-022. Ac-cessed 15 Oct. 2022. https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/516?locale=en_US
Taber, K. S. (2017). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Educa-tion, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














