Enhancing General Biology Instruction Through the Integration of the Cichlid Life Cycle

Authors

  • Francis P. Dela Cruz Meycauayan College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.09.26

Keywords:

Assessments, Biology instruction, Inquiry learning, Life cycle, STEM education

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of integrating the Flowerhorn cichlid life cycle into General Biology 2 instruction among 30 Grade 11 STEM students at San Martin National High School during SY 2025–2026. A quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design was employed, using a validated 30-item multiple-choice test to measure understanding of reproduction, adaptation, ecological relationships, and evolution. Results showed low prior knowledge in pretest scores but significant improvement in posttest scores, confirmed by a paired samples t-test at the 0.05 level. In addition, qualitative insights from a survey of ten struggling learners highlighted difficulties in fertilization, hormonal regulation, and ecological contexts, underscoring the need for scaffolding in inquiry-based tasks. Together, the quantitative gains and qualitative themes affirm that integrating the Flowerhorn cichlid life cycle as a contextualized, inquiry-driven strategy enhances comprehension, engagement, and retention. A lesson exemplar was developed to support meaningful and student-centered biology instruction, offering actionable implications for curriculum development and classroom practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, J., & Carter, L. (2022). Enhancing phys-iology education through live animal ob-servation: A case study in student en-gagement. Journal of Biological Educa-tion, 56(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1971234

CBE—Life Sciences Education. (2022). In-quiry-based learning and laboratory en-gagement in biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0045

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Re-search design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davidson, M. (2021). Student-centered strate-gies for adapting to scientific advance-ments in biology education. Education Sciences, 11(9), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090456

De Asis, A. A. (2021). Mitigating biology con-cept deficiencies through contextualized classroom instruction. Northern Iloilo State University Research Journal, 3(2), 45–60.

Department of Agriculture. (2022). Philippine tilapia industry roadmap 2022–2025. Bu-reau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources.

Education Sciences. (2024). Linking lessons to real-world applications: Boosting en-gagement in biology classrooms. Educa-tion Sciences, 14(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020112

Environmental Education Research. (2024). Local species integration in science les-sons: Impacts on contextual understand-ing. Environmental Education Research, 30(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.1234567

Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unit-ed Nations. (2023). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2023: Sustain-ability and resilience. FAO.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2020). How to design and evaluate research in educa-tion (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate re-search in education (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gasmen, J., & Ragaza, J. A. (2025). Occurrence of feral Flowerhorn cichlids in Lake Sam-paloc, Laguna, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 154(1), 45–56.

Gee, N. R., Fine, A. H., & McCardle, P. (2021). The impact of animals on human health and well-being: A systematic review. An-imals, 11(3), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030784

Hansen, M. J., Rypstra, A. L., & Walker, S. E. (2021). Biology beyond the classroom: Experiential learning through authentic research and community engagement. In-tegrative and Comparative Biology, 61(6), 2152–2163. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab123

International Journal of STEM Education. (2023). Integrating genetics and ecology in enriched biology modules: Impacts on comprehension and critical thinking. In-ternational Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00345-6

Johnson, R., & Larsen, T. (2023). Inquiry-based learning in animal science education: Ef-fects on critical thinking and retention. Journal of Animal Science Education, 41(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jase/41.2.112

Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2020). Peda-gogic frailty and resilience in higher edu-cation. Brill.

Koblmüller, S., Albertson, R. C., Genner, M. J., Takahashi, T., & Sefc, K. M. (2025). Ad-vances in cichlid research VI: Behavior, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Hy-drobiologia, 852(1), 3783–3790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-025-1234-5

Lampropoulos, G., Tsiatsos, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2022). Augmented reality and gamifi-cation in biology education: Enhancing student engagement. Computers & Educa-tion, 179, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104399

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learn-ing: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Marin, R. (2025). Challenges and coping strat-egies of non-specialized biology teachers in selected secondary schools in the third congressional district of Quezon. Psychol-ogy and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 48(5), 112–125.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Multimedia learning: Re-search and practice. Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

McPherson-Geyser, M., de Villiers, R., & Kavai, P. (2020). The use of experiential learn-ing as a teaching strategy in life sciences. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13359a

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2020). Communi-cating climate change: A guide for educa-tors. Routledge.

National Research Council. (2021). Learning science in informal environments: Peo-ple, places, and pursuits. National Acad-emies Press.

Ocampo, R., Cruz, M., & Villanueva, J. (2024). Biodiversity-focused modules and their impact on student application of scientific concepts. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 67–79.

Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Devel-opment. (2021). Tilapia industry profile. PCAARRD.

Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Harvard University Press.

Piesiewicz, E., Torres-Dowdall, J., & Meyer, A. (2024). Early ontogeny in cichlid fishes: Insights into developmental biology. De-velopmental Biology, 495, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.01.005

Rayos, R., & Macaraeg, J. (2024). Determinants of production and technical efficiency of tilapia farming in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 15(2), 89–102.

Rometsch, S. J., Torres-Dowdall, J., & Meyer, A. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics of pre- and postzygotic reproductive isolation in cichlid fishes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1806), 20190535. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0535

Sadera, J. R. N., Torres, R. Y. S., & Rogayan, D. V., Jr. (2020). Challenges encountered by junior high school students in learning science: Basis for action plan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7405–7414. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082540

Santos, R., Cruz, A., & Villanueva, P. (2020). Inquiry-based learning strategies in Phil-ippine science classrooms. Journal of Sci-ence Education, 12(3), 145–160.

Sari, D. W. K., Achmad, H., Rahman, H., & Bi-masuci, H. (2023). Molecular identifica-tion of several morphologically distinct flowerhorn fish using mitochondrial COI gene marker. Journal of Tropical Biodi-versity and Biotechnology, 8(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.2023.123456

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2021). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Stanbrook, R., Brown, C., & Laland, K. (2021). Social environments and learning per-formance in cichlid fishes. Animal Behav-iour, 179, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.012

Villarino, R. T., & Villarino, M. L. (2023). Aca-demic performance of rural junior high school students in biology: Journal of Sci-ence Education, 15(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/xxxx

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yan, G. (2023, July 23). All that glittery fish isn’t gold for San Pablo’s Sampaloc Lake. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1806013/all-that-glittery-fish-isnt-gold-for-san-pablos-sampaloc-lake

Downloads

Published

23-09-2026

How to Cite

Dela Cruz, F. P. (2026). Enhancing General Biology Instruction Through the Integration of the Cichlid Life Cycle. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(9), 4147–4155. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.09.26