Predatory Lending and Financial Vulnerability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
Digital Lending Apps, Financial Vulnerability, Loan Sharking, Payday Loans, Predatory LendingAbstract
Lending institutions play an important role in helping people fulfill their financial requirements, handle unexpected situations, and support their personal needs or business operations. When done fairly, lending institutions provide access to funds that people may not currently have, helping them improve their financial security and opening new opportunities. However, lending becomes risky when it deviates from fair practices and results in predatory lending. The global problem of predatory lending continues to affect many borrowers as they become trapped in extended debt obligations due to deceptive loan conditions. This study examines how academic studies on predatory lending and financial vulnerability have evolved across different nations and academic disciplines. The Scopus database provided data for Bibliometrix (R) and VOSviewer to perform bibliometric analysis, which produced publication patterns, author rankings, and research subject areas covering all available studies from 1963 to 2025. Research on digital lending, poverty, and financial vulnerability in developing nations has emerged as a new area of study, where most existing studies focus on the United States housing market and subprime lending sector. The research indicates that scholars now link multiple fields of study to examine predatory lending as it requires knowledge from economics, law, and social sciences. The review highlights the increasing academic interest in responsible lending practices, which demand fair financial systems for vulnerable populations who use digital loans and low-income individuals. This study suggests helping improve the protection low-income borrowers and digital loan users in developing countries.
Downloads
References
Agarwal S, Amromin G, Ben-David I, Evanoff DD. Predatory Lending and Hidden Risks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2025;60(5):2526-2554. doi:10.1017/S0022109024000863Aalbers, M. B. (2009). The sociology and geog-raphy of mortgage markets: Reflections on the financial crisis. International Jour-nal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00867.x
Allcott, H., Kim, S., Taubinsky, D., & Zinman, J. (2022). Are high-interest loans predato-ry? Theory and evidence from payday lending. Journal of Public Economics, 207, 104597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104597
Bostic, R. W., Engel, K. C., McCoy, P. A., Pen-nington-Cross, A., & Wachter, S. M. (2008). Mortgage market credit and the financial crisis. Journal of Urban Econom-ics, 64(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.07.005
Braveman, P. (2022). Inequality and health: Policy implications beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 301, 114887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114887
Center for Responsible Lending. (2023). New report: Payday lenders took $2.4 billion in fees from borrowers last year. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblelending.org/media/new-report-predatory-payday-lenders-took-24-billion-fees-borrowers-year
Engel, K. C., & McCoy, P. A. (2002). A tale of three markets: The law and economics of predatory lending. Texas Law Review, 80(6), 1255–1381.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of Pub-Med, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Morgan, D. P. (2007). Defining and detecting predatory lending. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, 273, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1012386
Philippine Securities and Exchange Commis-sion. (2022). SEC orders online lending operators to stop collection harassment and privacy violations. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov.ph/news-and-updates
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to approval and in compliance with data privacy and ethical guidelines.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angel Jade V. Frialde, Evette Jillian R. Maiquez, Sheena S.P Ramos, Jennifer P. Solis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
