Perceptions Toward the Use of Digital Learning Resources Versus Traditional Textbooks in Studying Core Accounting Subjects Among Accountancy Students of Cavite State University Main Campus, S.Y. 2025–2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.01.25Keywords:
Printed textbooks, Learning materials, Learning preferences, Thematic analysisAbstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted in a state university in the Province of Cavite which covered the academic year 2025-2026 and explored the perceptions of accountancy students toward the use of digital learning materials as against traditional textbooks in studying core accounting subjects. Specifically, it aims to characterize the participants in terms of age, gender, year level, and monthly family income, investigate how often and in what situations accountancy students use digital and printed textbooks, examine the advantages and disadvantages of using both materials in learningaccounting core subjects, and recognize preferences. The research employed both quantitative and qualitative research with emphasis on the students’ experiences and perceptions. The entire population of 242 students enrolled under the accountancy program were included in the data collection applying in-depth and key informant interviews and focus group discussions, per year level. Responses were decoded manually following the steps of thematic analysis of Braun and Clark (2006). The findings revealed that printed textbooks remain as the main learning resources for students, with most indicating that they “often” use them while studying as a foundational resource. In contrast, digital materials are “often” utilized to augment the learning process. Further, the demographic profile of the participants is not a factor on the perceptions of students towards both digital and traditional learning materials; rather, the context of use is the main driver of their preference between digital and traditional learning materials. Students
alternately use both printed and digital materials, allowing one to supplement the gaps of the other.
Downloads
References
Alaku Ph.D, M. E., Okpala, N. V., & Bicrus Ph. D, A. S. (2022). Importance of digital Educa-tional resources: Implication for-quality assessment in second-ary education.ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375615120_importance_of_digital_education-al_resources_implication_for_quality_assessment_in_secondary_education
Aligo, L., & Prudente, S. (2025). Effectiveness of digital learning materials on students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. Journal of Global Education and Re-search, 1–9(1). https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1427&context=jger
Area-Moreira, M., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J., Peirats-Chacón, J. et al. The Digital Trans-formation of Instructional Materials. Views and Practices of Teachers, Families and Editors. Tech Know Learn 28, 1661–1685 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09664-8
Asio, J. M. R., Gadia, E., Abarintos, E., Paguio, D., & Balce, M. (2021). Internet Connec-tion and learning device availability of college students: Basis for Institutionaliz-ing flexible learning in the new Normal. Studies in Humanities and Education, 2(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.48185/she.v2i1.224
Awashreh, R., Hassiba, A., & Ghunaimi, H. (2025, June). A comparison of traditional, online, and hybrid learning models in ac-counting and finance education: Student perceptions and academic outcomes. In-ternational Journal of Advanced And Ap-plied Sciences. 10.21833/ijaas.2025.06.003
Baker, & Driscoll. (2022). Student Perceptions of the Learning Effectiveness of Printed Versus Digital Textbooks in College Ac-counting Classes. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 29(1). https://journal.stie-mce.ac.id/index.php/jabminternational/article/view/799/384
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cabual, R.A. (2021) Learning Styles and Pre-ferred Learning Modalities in the New Normal. Open Access Library Journal, 8: e7305. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107305
Chang, I. (2020). Open versus Traditional Textbooks: A Comparison of Student En-gagement and Performance. In the Inter-national Journal of Teaching and Learn-ing in Higher Education (No. 3; Vol. 32, pp. 488–498). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1300061.pdf
Corpuz, L., Butanas, J., Rodrigo, A., & Fiel, S. M. (2024, April). Traditional Learning Mate-rials Vs. Digital Learning Materials: A Case Study on Library Resources Prefer-ences Among Bachelor of Science in Ac-countancy Students. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0424.0928
Chrinerius, M., & Crispus, F., (2025). The im-pact of family incomes on the student’s academic performance; A case study of Metropolitan International University. Metropolitan Journal of Social and Educa-tional Researc, 4(4), 429–447. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391220718_The_Impact_of_Family_Incomes_on_the_Student's_Academic_Performance_A_Case_Study_Of_Metropolitan_International_University
Cuyag, J., Lawan, D., Coronel, M., Sanchez, G., & Lamanilao, M. L. (2024). Students' Pref-erences Between Printed and Digital Teaching Materials. International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Research for Inno-vation, Sustainability and Excellence, 1(9). 10.5281/zenodo.13744928 da Cos-ta, A. C., da Silva, B. G., Nasu, V. H., Nogueira, D. R., & Marques, C. (2021, Oc-tober 10).
Digital Videos in Accounting Education: A Study on Perceived Use and Satisfaction in the Light of Connectivism. Internation-al Journal of Research in education and Science (IJRES), 7(4), 1058-1075. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.238
Dharmarajlu, S. (2025). A comparison study of electronic versus traditional print Text-books on the influence of university stu-dents’ learning. The Journal of Educators Online. https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2025_22_3/dharmarajlu
Faizal, S. (2023). Impact of digital study mate-rial on student learning. In Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Tech-nology (Vol. 44, Issue 6, pp.3068–3069). https://www.propulsiontechjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/3857/2609
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learn-ing and teaching styles in engineering ed-ucation. Engineering educa-tion,78,674-681. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257431200_Learning_and_Teaching_Styles_in_Eng ineering_Education
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digi-taltechnologies in education: A review. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hilton, R., Moos, C., & Barnes, C. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Students’ Per-ceptions ofLearning in Online Versus Traditional Courses. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching,4(3),2-11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359380815_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Students%27_Perceptions_of_Learning_in_Online_Versus_Traditional_Courses
Jabbar, A., & Warraich, N. (2022). Gender dif-ferences in leisure reading habits: a sys-tematic review of literature. Emerald In-sight. https://www.emerald.com/gkmc/article-abstract/72/6-7/572/104261/Gender-differences-in-leisure-reading-habits-a?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Kilag, O. K. T., PAU Excellencia Global Acade-my Foundation, Inc., Del Socorro, A. S., Dulwich International School, Suzhou, China, Largo, J. L., Schools Division of Talisay City, Cebu, Philippines, Peras, C. C., Schools Division of Zamboanga del Norte, Philippines, Book, J. F. P., Schools Division of Toledo City, Philippines, Abendan, C. F. K., & ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Balam-ban, Cebu, Philippines. (2023). Perspec-tives and experiences in online teaching and learning. In Science and Education (Vol. 4) [Journalarticle]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/perspectives-and-experiences-in-online-teaching-andlearning
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Ex-perience as the Source of Learning and Development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice‑Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029_Experiential_Learning_Experi-ence_As_The_Source_Of_Learning_And_Development
Lazaro, L., Pedrozo, J., Cabarogias, C., & Abu-tan, G. (2023, June 05). Family Economic Condition, Students’ Learning Environ-ment, Learning Styles, and its Influence on Students Learning Outcome: A Se-quential Explanatory Mixed Method Re-search. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research andStudies. https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=57409893012bf02395708fde5dc910024eb891140b2433f4 3144eda9449f0e2dJmltdHM9MTc2NTA2NTw-MA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=19e696e9-5334-6c29-2786-82aa52e66d4a&psq=effect+of+family+income+on+student%27s+learning+material+preferen ce&u=a1a
Li, F., & Wang, L. (2024). A study on textbook use and its effects on students’ academic performance. Disciplinary and Interdisci-plinary Science Education Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00094-1
McCoy, B. (2020). Gen Z and digital distrac-tions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class relat-ed purposes. Journal of Media Education, 11(2), 5–32. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/71
Mizrachi, Diane & Salaz, Alicia. (2020). Beyond the Surveys: Qualitative Analysis from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS). College & Research Li-braries.808.10.5860/crl.81.5.808. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342617419_Beyond_the_Surveys_Qualita-tive_Analysis_from_the_Academic_Reading_Format_International_Study_ARFIS
Ngo, H. N., & Phan, A. N. (2022). COVID-19 and higher education in Vietnam: Systemati-cally rethinking the quality assurance sys-tem and practices towards the ‘new nor-mal’ in post-crisis era. Policy Futures in Education, 21(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221095924
Osih, S., & Singh, U. (2020). Students’ percep-tion on the adoption of an e-textbook (digital) as an alternative to the-printed textbook. South African-Journal of Higher Educa-tion,34(6). https://doi.org/10.20853/34-6-3892
Park, J., & Lee, J. (2021). Effects of E-Books and printed books on EFL learners’ read-ing comprehension and grammatical knowledge. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1318666
Pepin, B., Kock, Zj. Students’ Use of Resources in a Challenge-Based Learning Context Involving Mathematics. Int.J.Res.Undergrad. Math. Ed. 7, 306–327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00136-x
Ruggieri, C. (2020). Students’ use and percep-tion of textbooks and online resources in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020123
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during prob-lem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Soe, T. (2024). Investigating Critical Thinking in ELT Textbooks: A Systematic Litera-ture Review of Textbook Evaluation Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379435942_Investigating_Critical_Thinking_in_ELT_Textbooks_A_Systematic_Litera-tu-re_Review_of_Textbook_Evaluation_Studies
Tani, M., Manuguerra, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Can videos affect learning outcomes? Ev-idence from an actual learning environ-ment. Educational technology research and development : ETR & D, 70(5), 1675–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3
Yu, Z., Xu, W., & Sukjairungwattana, P. (2022). Meta-analyses of differences in blended and traditional learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Frontiers in Psycholo-gy, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926947
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jewel Joyce B. Ortega

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














