The Moderating Effect of Personal Experience on False Information Awareness and Reliability of Information to the Psycho-Social Development of Grade 12 Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.07.32Keywords:
False information, cognitive development, personal experience, critical thinking, media literacy,, misinformationAbstract
In today’s digital age, false information poses a significant threat to adolescents’ cognitive and social development. This study investigates how personal experience influences the relationship between awareness of false information, perceived reliability, and the psycho-social development of Grade 12 students. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to evaluate students’ awareness of misinformation, their personal encounters with it, and their perceptions of source credibility. Results show that personal experience with misinformation significantly shapes students’ perceptions of reliability. Those who have encountered false information—either directly or indirectly—tend to exhibit heightened awareness and skepticism. This critical awareness helps them process content more carefully, enabling them to distinguish credible sources from unreliable ones. Quantitative findings reveal that these students are more adept at identifying and questioning misinformation, reducing its negative impact. Qualitative insights further emphasize the psycho-social benefits of such awareness. Students experienced in handling misinformation demonstrate stronger critical thinking skills, increased emotional resilience, and improved social competence, including better communication and interpersonal relationships. The study underscores the value of integrating real-world experiences with misinformation into educational curricula. By embedding critical media literacy and reflective engagement with false information into classroom activities, educators can better prepare students to navigate the complex information landscape. These interventions not only support students’ academic growth but also enhance their emotional and social development, contributing to the cultivation of a more informed, resilient, and socially capable generation.
Downloads
References
A Afriani, M., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2021). Analysis of social interaction of Grade IV elemen-tary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(4).
Avcı, M. (2023). Belongingness, social con-nectedness, and life satisfaction in col-lege students after COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Happiness and Health, 3(2), 23-36.
Babakhani, N. (2014). Perception of class and sense of school belonging and self-regulated learning: A causal model. Pro-cedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1477-1482.
Baek, C. (2023). How (do) school experiences contribute to students’ sense of belong-ing? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-14.
Baek, E. C., & Parkinson, C. (2022). Shared un-derstanding and social connection: Inte-grating approaches from social psychol-ogy, social network analysis, and neuro-science. Social and Personality Psychol-ogy Compass, 16(11), e12710.
Cornelius-Ukpepi, B. U., Ndifon, R. A., & Sun-day, I. O. (2019). Socio-cultural diversity as determinant of social studies stu-dents' academic performance in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(18), 688-696.
Fernández, D. P., Ryan, M. K., & Begeny, C. T. (2023). Recognizing the diversity in how students define belonging: Evidence of differing conceptualizations, including as a function of students’ gender and so-cioeconomic background. Social Psy-chology of Education, 26(3), 673-708.
Garcia, C. E. (2021). The role of social studies course in the 21st century society: Per-spective from educators and learners. Journal of World Englishes and Educa-tional Practices, 3(1), 11-22.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed varia-ble mediation, moderation, and condi-tional process modeling.
Hobbs, R. (2017). Media literacy in the infor-mation age: Current perspectives. Routledge.
Jolls, T., & Wilson, C. (2014). The core con-cepts: Fundamental to media literacy yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(2), 68-78.
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confront-ing the challenges of motivated reason-ing and misinformation. American Edu-cational Research Journal, 54(1), 3-34.
Kumar, S., & Shah, N. (2018). False information on web and social media: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08559.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misin-formation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psy-chological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131.
McDougall, J. (2019). Media literacy versus fake news: Critical thinking, resilience and civic engagement. Media Education Research Journal, 10(1), 5-14.
Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibil-ity and trust of information in online en-vironments: The use of cognitive heuris-tics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John Luis D. Abiño, Jherwin P. Hermosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
