Non-Education Science Teachers’ Teaching Competency and Challenges as Inputs to Proposed Teacher Training Model and Training Program for Secondary Schools

Authors

  • Mary Rhovian B. Bacani Graduate School, Centro Escolar University, College of Arts and Sciences, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, 2201, Philippines
  • Dennis G. Caballes Graduate School, Centro Escolar University, Teacher Education & General Education, Olivarez College Parañaque, 1700, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.07.11

Keywords:

Non-education science teachers, Teacher competencies, Challenges, Professional development, Training model

Abstract

This study explored the experiences and teaching competencies of non-education science teachers in the Division of Zambales before and during the pandemic to develop a training model suited for effective science instruction. A mixed-method sequential explanatory design was employed, involving 74 non-education science teachers and 36 supervisors. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed first, followed by qualitative data to deepen understanding of the results. Findings revealed that while teachers demonstrated general proficiency in curriculum planning, and instruction, assessment remained their weakest area. Challenges intensified during the pandemic, particularly in curriculum planning and assessment. Teachers faced difficulties in content depth, lesson planning, evaluation tools, and adapting instruction to student needs. Coping strategies were largely intrapersonal, including self-reliance, strategic planning, and emotional regulation, with limited reliance on external support. The study led to the development of the ELEVATE Teacher Training Model, a professional development framework with seven components: Enrich, builds content and planning skills; Leverage, promotes active learning and peer support; Equip, strengthens assessment skills; Validate, aligns strategies with learner traits; Adapt, encourages flexible, data-driven teaching; Transform, integrates ICT and reshapes negative coping; and Empower, supports continuous growth and leadership. The model provides a practical basis for training programs tailored to non-education science teachers. It provides a practical foundation for training programs tailored to non-education science teachers. Future research should assess its implementation, effectiveness, and long-term impact on teaching practices especially for non-education major teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abragan, F. Q., Abarcas, V., Aquino, I. M., & Ba-gongon, R. E. (2022). Research review on K-12 curriculum implementation in the Philippines: A generic perspective. Euro-pean Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zeno-do.7272126

Alcala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teach-ing amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Inter-national Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.602

Co, A., Abella, C.’ & De Jesus, Fhrizz. (2021). Teaching Outside Specialization from the Perspective of Science Teachers. OALib. 08. 1-13. 10.4236/oalib.1107725.

Deady, K. (2022). Yes, you can become a teacher without a degree in education. TeachAway. Retrieved from https://www.teachaway.com/ blog/can-you-become-teacher-without-teaching-degree

Delgado, C.I.L., Zobel, E.E., Delgado, M.L. (2021). Approaches to Improving Teach-er Quality and Effectiveness: What Works?. In: Ra, S., Jagannathan, S., Mac-lean, R. (eds) Powering a Learning Society During an Age of Disruption. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Is-sues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 58. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0983-1_6

Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). DepEd continues to drive improvements to teaching quality with new standards for school leaders. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/10/04/ deped-continues-to-drive-improvements-to-teaching-quality-with-new-standards-for-school- leaders/

Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). Science teaching scholarship program implementation guide. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Fernandez, G., Banet, L., & Vidal, A. (2022). Students’ performance in scientific skills during secondary education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(10), em2165. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12444

Haw, N.J.L., J. Uy, K.T.L. Sy and M.R.M. Abrigo. (2020). Epidemiological profile and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in the Philippines. National Library of Medicine. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002137

Ignacio, L. B., Cristobal, A. G. A., & David, P. C. (2022). Impact of Policy Implementation on Education Quality: A Case Study on Philippines’ Low Ranking in International and Local Assessment Programs. Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education, 3, 41–54. Retrieved from https://ajpe.feu.edu.ph/index.php/ajpe/article/view/7663

Mohamad Nasri, N., Husnin, H., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Halim, L. (2020). Mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a snapshot from Ma-laysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers’ education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 546-553. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802582

Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. Inter-national Journal of Humanities and Inno-vation, 4(1), 1-4. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610428.pdf

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Philippine. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html

Penuliar, A.J. and Natividad, L. (2025). Teacher Specialization Mismatch Disrupts Philip-pine Education System. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ ab-stract=5086587 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5086587

Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J., & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the con-tinuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ educa-tion/Supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf

Sundarwati, E., & Pahlevi, M. R. (2021). EFL teachers’ challenges and opportunities of emergency remote teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemi C: Narrative in-quiry. Language and Education Journal Undiksha, 4(2), 74-85. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBI/article/view/37565

Toring, S. (2017). The lived experiences and perceptions of social studies teachers and school administrators on the out-of-field teaching phenomenon in Zamboanga City. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v29i1.519

Tran, L. H. (2023). Teaching outside area of expertise: A barrier to or enabler of teachers’ sense of competence? VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5162

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures to-gether: A new social contract for educa-tion. International Commission on the Fu-tures of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en

Wong, J. (2020). Teaching competence and attitude towards the teaching profession of senior high school teachers: Edu-cation vs. non-education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 7(1), 54-61. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3666599

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

How to Cite

Bacani, M. R. B., & Caballes, D. G. . (2025). Non-Education Science Teachers’ Teaching Competency and Challenges as Inputs to Proposed Teacher Training Model and Training Program for Secondary Schools. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(7), 3347-3360. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.07.11